If 卖家 want to use an existing survey, 哪个日期应列在T-47住宅物业誓章(TXR 1907)第4段?
The purpose of the T-47 Residential Real Property Affidavit (TXR 1907)确认自卖方填写第4段空白之日起,除了表格上列出的内容外,该房产没有发生任何变化. 该日期应为卖方不知道该物业已发生变更的日期. At the bottom of Paragraph 4, 卖方可列出自该日以来发生的财产变更,如无变更,则可注明“无”.
The 卖家 have several options as to what date to fill in. 因为誓章的目的是确认现有的调查结果, 卖家可以使用最近一次现有调查的日期, 哪一项调查可能是由他们或由房屋的前业主订购的. 另外, 卖方可以使用他们获得房产的日期,因为这可以被视为他们对房产的任何变化有实际了解的最早日期. It is ultimately up to the 卖家 to choose what date to use.
If an existing survey is used, 当卖家填上他们完成交易的日期时,我总是觉得比较放心. Then I suggest boundary coverage be done in the title policy.
这篇文章中没有任何地方提到需要对表格进行公证,并得到每个财产所有者的签名. 这个小细节使得表格很有用(如果没有公证的话就没用了).
这篇文章的重点是专门讨论应该使用的日期. 如果他们讨论这种形式的所有方面,那将是一篇更长的文章. 然而, 你提到需要公证是他们可以写另一篇文章的好主意, which would be very beneficial for others to read. 🙂
No all owners have to come in front of the notary….只是其中之一
我总是使用现有调查的日期,因为他们证明了他们的知识, that survey is valid. 然而, I can see where the date they closed could also be used. What do most of you use?
Date of purchase of home..which is typically when survey was also done..但即使不是..购买日期
它不应该是截止日期,因为签署宣誓书是有时间限制的. Check your contract.
I don’t believe you have much recourse if later the Buyer, 现在船东发现指定的检验报告实际上有一个错误. 我绝不2021十大正规彩票app买方接受任何形式的转让单据.
Randy, “Never” is problematic. 如果你的买家是现金买家,不需要所有权政策,你说的可能是对的. Otherwise if there is a title policy with boundary coverage, as there is with most purchases, 当产权公司和抵押公司已经批准了一份完美的现有调查报告时,你就会让你的客户为一份新的调查支付不必要的费用. Even if there is a cash buyer, 边界覆盖的成本远低于新调查的成本,而业权政策将保护土地… 阅读更多»
👏
是聪明的. Always get a new survey. 仅仅因为卖方不知道房产在购买后发生了任何变化,并不意味着房产没有发生任何变化. 邻居可能在他们不知情的情况下建造了建筑物或浇筑了混凝土,侵占了他们的财产. 邻居可能还在地产线上建了栅栏. A survey is cheap insurance.
汤姆·格里斯克——不像新获得的产权政策上的边界保险那么便宜, if Title company agrees to write policy.
This article is incorrect. From a legal standpoint, T-47上唯一允许的日期是最近一次调查的日期, not the date the seller acquired the property. 他们对自调查以来所发生的任何变化以及与调查不同的任何结构变化都有“建设性的了解”, as they are the owners of the property. 即使是从未见过房产的外国投资者也没关系. That is the crux of the legal concept “constructive knowledge.”
我想知道与别人的经历相比,我在“我的世界”中遇到的两个问题. In my market there are two title companies. Each of them tell me that if I want area and boundary coverage, I have to have a new survey, and an existing survey won’t suffice. 他们还告诉我,如果T-47有任何变化, they will require a new survey, even if no one is requesting area and boundary coverage. I guess a title company can require whatever they want, but both of these practices seem excessive to me. 这些常见吗?… 阅读更多»
斯蒂芬•威廉姆斯-That is not the case in my area. 我接触过的产权公司都很乐意接受现有的调查, unless there is no legitimate T-47. Quite a few years ago, 所有的交易都需要一项新的调查,也许你的产权公司只是坚持这项政策
I would suspect ties to a surveyor, but that is just me.